| If you are arrested
for DUI in North Dakota, it will result in
two separate cases. The first cases is the
criminal court case in which the prosecution
will bear the burden of proving beyond a reasonable
doubt that you broke the law by driving under
the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. The
criminal case can result in penalties such
as mandatory alcohol rehabilitation classes,
license suspensions, fines and even jail time.
The second case is the administrative case
against the North Dakota Department of Transportation.
This case is civil in nature and has a lesser
burden of proof than the criminal case. Since
these cases are separate and independent
of each other it is possible to have the
criminal charges dismissed and still have
your license revoked through the administrative
case.
With respect to the criminal case, the prosecution
has two separate theories in which to pursue
the charges. The first theory, and the most
common, is what is known as the "per
se" theory. Under this theory the prosecution
must prove that you were driving with a blood-alcohol
concentration of .08% or higher. Your physical
or mental condition at the time is irrelevant as this theory relies solely on your body chemistry.
The second theory is what is known as the
traditional "under the influence" theory.
Under this theory the prosecution would introduce
evidence such as the arresting officer’s
testimony regarding your field sobriety tests,
your physical condition and general appearance,
your driving pattern and possibly the statements
of eyewitnesses. This evidence will be used
to show that due to your consumption of alcohol
your mental and physical faculties were negatively
affected and as a result you were unsafe
to drive. It is possible to be convicted
under this theory even if you're blood-alcohol
concentration was below the legal limit.
|